In re LIBOR-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation
Lenders LIBOR Settlements
MDL No. 11-MD-2262 (NRB)

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING THE SETTLEMENTS WITH CREDIT SUISSE AND MUFG

Expand/Collapse All
  • A Court authorized the notice because you have a right to know about the proposed Settlements in this class-action lawsuit and about all of your options before the Court decides whether to give final approval to the Settlements. The notice explains the lawsuit, the Settlements, and your legal rights.

    Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is overseeing this case. This litigation has been consolidated within In re LIBOR-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2262, and the Settlements relate to an action referred to as the “Lender Action” because it involves plaintiffs who originated loans, held loans, held interests in loans, owned loans, owned interests in loans, purchased loans, purchased interests in loans, sold loans, or sold interests in loans with interest rates based upon U.S. Dollar LIBOR, which rates adjusted at any time between August 1, 2007 and May 31, 2010 (the “Class Period”).

  • Banks on the U.S. Dollar LIBOR panel (and their affiliates) around the world were sued by lending institutions (“Plaintiffs”) who claim that the banks manipulated U.S. Dollar LIBOR during the financial crisis, artificially lowering the rate. Plaintiffs claim that Settling Defendants and other banks manipulated U.S. Dollar LIBOR, and that, as a result, institutions that originated, held, purchased or sold loans or interests in loans tied to U.S. Dollar LIBOR did not receive as much interest payments for their U.S. Dollar LIBOR-based loans or interests in loans as they should have and/or paid more or received less than they should have in connection with such transactions. Settling Defendants and the Non-Settling Defendants deny these claims and maintain they did nothing wrong. Plaintiffs in the Lender Action have brought (a) common-law fraud and (b) conspiracy to commit fraud claims against Settling Defendants and the Non-Settling Defendants.

    The Court has denied a motion to dismiss the fraud claims asserted by The Berkshire Bank against certain Defendants. Moreover, on February 28, 2018, the Court denied The Berkshire Bank’s motion for class certification. In so doing, the Court held, among other things, that a class action is not appropriate because (i) common issues do not predominate over individual ones; (ii) class-action status would not be superior to the maintenance of individual actions; and (iii) the proposed class representative, The Berkshire Bank, did not meet the adequacy of representation requirements imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P.  23(a)(4). Aside from class Settlements, The Berkshire Bank is continuing to pursue only its individual claims. The Berkshire Bank petitioned the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to review the Court’s denial of class certification. The Court of Appeals denied that petition. Given the Court of Appeals’ decision, the only remaining avenue for reversal of the denial of The Berkshire Bank’s motion for class certification is an appeal taken after the entry of final judgment on the merits. Accordingly, settlements are likely to be the only way that Lender Class Members will achieve any recovery through the Lender Action. 

    Previous settlements resolving the claims against Citibank, N.A., Citigroup Inc., HSBC Bank plc, HSBC Holdings plc, Barclays Bank plc, JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank. N.A., Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., UBS AG, Deutsche Bank AG and Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. were granted final approval on December 20, 2018, May 26, 2020, and March 15, 2021. In the meantime, Plaintiffs continued to pursue the Lender Action against the remaining defendants.

    Settlements have been reached with Credit Suisse and MUFG and that is why you received the Notice. The Settlements do not impact claims in the lawsuit against the remaining Non-Settling Defendants, and the lawsuit is ongoing as to these remaining Non-Settling Defendants. The remaining Non-Settling Defendants are:

    • British Bankers’ Association, BBA Enterprises Ltd, and BBA LIBOR Ltd;
    • Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen Boerenleenbank B.A.;
    • Lloyds Banking Group PLC;
    • HBOS PLC;
    • Royal Bank of Canada;
    • The Norinchukin Bank;
    • The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC;
    • WestLB AG; and
    • Westdeutsche Immobilenbank AG.
  • Yes. There are many cases involving similar facts and allegations that have been consolidated as a multi-district litigation (“MDL”) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, entitled: In re LIBOR-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation, 11-MD-2262. The Settlements are made with Plaintiffs in the Lender Action only.

  • In a class action, “Class Representatives” sue on behalf of themselves and others with similar claims, who together are the “Class” or “Class Members.” In this Settlement, the Class Representatives are The Berkshire Bank and the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico. In a class action, one court action resolves the issues for all Class Members, except for those who exclude themselves from the Class. While The Berkshire Bank and Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico represented the Class in negotiating the Settlement, the Court has ruled that The Berkshire Bank did not meet the adequacy of representation requirements imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P.  23(a)(4).

  • The Parties have engaged in lengthy negotiations and Plaintiffs and Settling Defendants have agreed to the Settlements. By agreeing to settle, the Parties avoid the costs and uncertainty of further litigation, and the people affected will get a chance to receive compensation. The Class Representatives and their attorneys think the Settlements are best for all Lender Class Members. The proposed Settlements do not mean that any law was broken or that Settling Defendants did anything wrong.

  • You are included in the Settlements if you (lending institution) are:

    • Headquartered in the United States, including United States territories; and
    • Originated loans, held loans, held interests in loans, owned loans, owned interests in loans, purchased loans, purchased interests in loans, sold loans, or sold interests in loans with interest rates based upon U.S. Dollar LIBOR (“U.S. Dollar LIBOR-Based Loans”), which rates adjusted at any time between August 1, 2007, and May 31, 2010 (see Question 8).

    You are not a member of the Class, even if you meet the above criteria, if you are:

    • One of the Defendants or alleged co-conspirators or their employees, officers, or directors;
    • One of the Defendants’ parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, legal representatives, heirs, successors, assigns, or any person acting on their behalf;
    • An entity in which any Defendants have a controlling interest;
    • Any judicial officers presiding over the Lender Action and the members of his/her immediate families and judicial staff.

    Investment vehicles (see Question 7) are not excluded from the Class solely because they are, or are managed by, affiliates or subsidiaries of the Defendant. “Investment vehicles” are any investment company, separately managed account or pooled investment fund, including, but not limited to: (i) mutual fund families, exchange-traded funds, fund of funds and hedge funds; and (ii) employee benefit plans.

  • U.S. Dollar LIBOR is based upon the rates at which each individual bank on the U.S. Dollar LIBOR panel could borrow funds, were it to do so by asking for and then accepting inter-bank offers in reasonable market size, just prior to 11:00 am London time, and is calculated as the average of the middle eight contributed rates by the sixteen panel banks each day. It is a reference point for determining certain interest rates for certain financial instruments worldwide. LIBOR rates are calculated for several currencies, such as U.S. Dollars, and several borrowing periods, ranging from overnight to one year. They are published each business day. The Settlements and litigation only involve U.S. Dollar LIBOR.

  • The Settlements relate to U.S. Dollar LIBOR-based loans that include any term, provision, obligation or right to be paid or to receive interest based upon U.S. Dollar LIBOR.

  • If you are not sure whether you are included in the Settlements, you may call 1-833-609-9716 with questions. You may also email the Claims Administrator at info@LendersLiborSettlements.com or write with questions to:

    Lenders LIBOR Settlements
    c/o JND Legal Administration
    P.O. Box 91347
    Seattle, WA 98111

  • The Settlements with the Settling Defendants will create a $760,000 Settlement Fund that will be used to pay eligible Class Members who submitted valid claims. The cost to administer the Settlements, attorneys’ fees, and the payment to the Class Representatives will come out of the Settlement Fund (see Question 20).

    More details are in the Settlement Agreements, which is available on the Important Documents page.

  • The Settlement Fund will be distributed to settlement class members pro rata, in proportion to a reasonable estimate of their damages, after deduction of any fees and expenses (see Question 20). This distribution will be made pursuant to a Plan of Distribution, which is available on the Important Documents page. The Plan of Distribution provides that each Class Member will receive a pro rata distribution, based on the reduced interest the Class Member received during the Class Period as a result of the alleged suppression. A chart showing the applicable amount of alleged suppression during the Class Period is available on the Important Documents page, and it is based on expert modeling the Plaintiffs have used in support of their litigation. The expert modeling or the calculations determined by the modeling are not binding on the court and are only for the purposes of these Settlement Agreements. Class Members had the option to comment or object to any portion of the Plan of Distribution at the Fairness Hearing. The Settlement Agreements will remain in place if the Court rejects or alters the proposed Plan of Distribution, but otherwise approves the Settlements.

  • Class Members who are entitled to payments will receive their payments after the Court grants final approval to the Settlement and after any appeals are resolved (see Question 23 below). If there are appeals, resolving them can take time. Please be patient.

  • Unless you exclude yourself from the Settlements, you will give up your right to sue Settling Defendants for the claims being resolved by these Settlements. The specific claims you are giving up against Settling Defendants and all related parties are called “Released Claims” and are set forth in the Proposed Order for Final Approval of the Settlements:

    Any and all manner of claims, causes of action, cross-claims, counterclaims, charges, liabilities, demands, judgments, suits, obligations, debts, setoffs, rights of recovery, or liabilities for any obligations of any kind whatsoever (however denominated), of every nature and description, whether class or individual, in law or equity or arising under constitution, statute, regulation, ordinance, contract, or otherwise in nature, for fees, costs, penalties, fines, debts, expenses, attorneys' fees, and damages, whenever incurred, and liabilities of any nature whatsoever (including joint and several), whether based on federal, state, local, statutory or common law, in equity, or on any other law, rule, regulation (including Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), ordinance, contract, or the law of any foreign jurisdiction, whether fixed or contingent, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, asserted or unasserted, matured or unmatured, arising from or relating in any way to the origination, ownership, purchase, or sale of loans (or interests in loans, including through mortgage-backed securities, home or business loans, or other instruments) with interest rates tied to LIBOR which adjusted during the Class Period, and the acts, facts, statements, or omissions that were or could have been alleged or asserted by Lender Plaintiffs or any member of the Settlement Class in the Lender Action or in any other action in any court or forum, which any Releasing Party ever had, now has, or hereafter may have against the Released Parties (whether directly, derivatively, representationally, or in any other capacity), from the beginning of time.

    Upon court approval of the Settlements, you will be “releasing” Credit Suisse and MUFG and all related persons or entities as described in the Settlement Agreements and the Proposed Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice granting Final Approval to the Settlements. These documents are available on the Important Documents page. Please read these documents carefully. If you have any questions you can contact the law firm listed in Question 19 for free or you can, of course, speak with your own lawyer.

  • Class Members who already submitted a valid Proof of Claim to the Claims Administrator in connection with the previous settlements in the Lender Action were not required submit a new claim. The Claims Administrator will use the information already on file to ascertain your eligibility for the Settlements.

    Class Members who did not submit a valid Proof of Claim to the Claims Administrator in connection with the previous settlements in the Lender Action were required to submit acceptable Proofs of Claim in connection with these Settlements in order to share in the Settlements’ proceeds.

    To be eligible for a payment, you had to complete and submit a proof of claim by June 8, 2022. Claims could be submitted by mail or online on this website. If you submitted a proof of claim with your contact information, you will receive future notifications containing additional important information, including with respect to any future settlements.

  • The Settlements provide a process for Class Members to contest the rejection of a claim. You will get further details in the letter you receive after your claim has been processed. If your claim is rejected, you may request a review. You will need to do so in writing and submit reasons for why you are contesting the rejection along with any supporting documentation. If your dispute cannot be resolved, it may be presented to the Court for review. The Court’s decision will be final and binding. More details are in the Settlement Agreement, which is available on the Important Documents page.

  • If you do not want to participate in the Settlements, and you want to keep the right to sue Credit Suisse and MUFG about the issues in this case, then you must exclude yourself, or “opt out” of, the Class.

  • The deadline to exclude yourself from the Settlements has passed. Class Members who wished to exclude themselves had to mail a letter or other written document ("Request for Exclusion") to the Settlement Administrator postmarked no later than June 22, 2022.

  • No. Unless you excluded yourself, you gave up the right to sue Credit Suisse and MUFG for the claims that you release through the Settlements.

  • No. You will not get a payment if you excluded yourself from the Settlements.

  • The Court has appointed the Pomerantz LLP law firm to represent all Lender Class Members as interim “Class Counsel.” The firm can be contacted at:

    Jeremy A. Lieberman
    POMERANTZ LLP
    600 Third Avenue
    20th Floor
    New York, NY 10016

    You will not be charged for contacting this lawyer. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense.

  • Class Counsel will ask the Court for attorneys’ fees up to one-third of the combined $760,000 Settlement Fund as well as reimbursement for costs and expenses. The fees and expenses awarded by the Court will be paid out of the Settlement Fund. The Court will decide the amount of fees to award. Class Counsel may choose to share part of any attorneys’ fees awarded by the Court with Mordchai Krausz, Esq., in accordance with the level of his work and responsibility in the prosecution of this Action. Class Counsel’s choice to share any of the attorneys’ fees awarded by the Court is not subject to Court approval and it will not influence the amount of attorneys’ fees awarded to Class Counsel by the Court.

     

  • The deadline to object to the Settlements has passed. To object, members of the Lender Class had to submit an objection to the Court, to Lender Class Counsel, and to Counsel for the Defendants, with a postmark no later than June 22, 2022.

    If your objection was not postmarked by the deadline and did not include the requisite information, it will not be valid.

  • Objecting is simply telling the Court that you disagree with something about the Settlements. You can object only if you do not exclude yourself from the Class. Excluding yourself is telling the Court that you do not want to be part of the Class. If you excluded yourself, you have no basis to object because the Settlements no longer affect you.

  • The Court will hold a Fairness Hearing at 2:30 p.m. on July 13, 2022 in a format to be determined by the Court that the Court will announce on the case docket in advance of the hearing. The Court may move the hearing to a different time without additional notice. Updated information can be obtained on this website or by calling 1-833-609-9716. At this hearing, the Court will consider whether the Settlements, Plan of Distribution, and any proposed fees and expenses are fair, reasonable, and adequate. If there are objections, the Court will consider them and will listen to people who have asked to speak at the hearing. The Court will also address Class Counsel’s request for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement for costs and expenses. After the hearing, the Court will decide whether to approve the Settlements. We do not know how long these decisions will take.

  • No. Class Counsel will answer questions the Court may have. But, you or your own lawyer are welcome to attend at your expense. If you send an objection, you do not have to attend the hearing. As long as you mailed your written objection on time, the Court will consider it. You may also have your own lawyer attend, but it is not necessary.

  • You may ask the Court for permission to speak at the Fairness Hearing. To speak at the Fairness Hearing, you must send a letter or other written document saying that the letter or document is your “Notice of Intention to Appear” in the Lender Class Settlement Fairness Hearing in In re LIBOR-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2262. Be sure to include your name, address, telephone number, and signature. You must send your “Notice of Intention to Appear” to the addresses listed in Question 21, so that it is postmarked no later than June 22, 2022.

  • The notice summarizes the proposed Settlement. More details are in the Settlement Agreement. You can get a copy of the Settlement Agreement or Final Approval Order on the Important Documents page of this website. You also may write with questions to Lenders LIBOR Settlements, c/o JND Legal Administration, P.O. Box 91347, Seattle, WA 98111, by email at info@LendersLiborSettlements.com or call the toll-free number, 1-833-609-9716. You can also get a proof of claim here, or by calling the toll-free number, 1-833-609-9716.

For More Information

Visit this website often to get the most up-to-date information.

Mail

Lenders LIBOR Settlements
c/o JND Legal Administration
P.O. Box 91347
Seattle, WA 98111