In re LIBOR-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation
Lenders LIBOR Settlements
MDL No. 11-MD-2262 (NRB)

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS REGARDING THE SETTLEMENTS WITH DEUTSCHE BANK AG

Expand/Collapse All
  • A Court authorized the notice because you have a right to know about the proposed Settlement in this class-action lawsuit and about all of your options before the Court decides whether to give final approval to the Settlement. The notice explains the lawsuit, the Settlement, and your legal rights.

    Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is overseeing this case. This litigation has been consolidated within In re LIBOR-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2262, and the Settlement relates to an action referred to as the “Lender Action” because it involves plaintiffs who originated loans, held loans, held interests in loans, owned loans, owned interests in loans, purchased loans, purchased interests in loans, sold loans, or sold interests in loans with interest rates based upon U.S. Dollar LIBOR, which rates adjusted at any time between August 1, 2007 and May 31, 2010 (the “Class Period”).

  • Banks on the U.S. Dollar LIBOR panel (and their affiliates) around the world were sued by lending institutions (“Plaintiffs”) who claim that the banks manipulated U.S. Dollar LIBOR during the financial crisis, artificially lowering the rate. Plaintiffs claim that Settling Defendants and other banks manipulated U.S. Dollar LIBOR, and that, as a result, institutions that originated, held, purchased or sold loans or interests in loans tied to U.S. Dollar LIBOR did not receive as much interest payments for their U.S. Dollar LIBOR-based loans or interests in loans as they should have and/or paid more or received less than they should have in connection with such transactions. Settling Defendant and the Non-Settling Defendants deny these claims and maintain they did nothing wrong. Plaintiffs in the Lender Action have brought (a) common-law fraud and (b) conspiracy to commit fraud claims against Settling Defendant and the Non-Settling Defendants.

    The Court has denied a motion to dismiss the fraud claims asserted by The Berkshire Bank against certain Defendants, but the Court has dismissed the fraud claims asserted by the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico as barred by the statute of limitations. Moreover, on February 28, 2018, the Court denied The Berkshire Bank’s motion for class certification. In so doing, the Court held, among other things, that a class action is not appropriate because (i) common issues do not predominate over individual ones; (ii) class-action status would not be superior to the maintenance of individual actions; and (iii) the proposed class representative, The Berkshire Bank, did not meet the adequacy of representation requirements imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P.  23(a)(4). Aside from class Settlements, The Berkshire Bank is continuing to pursue only its individual claims. The Berkshire Bank petitioned the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to review the Court’s denial of class certification. The Court of Appeals denied that petition. Given the Court of Appeals’ decision, the only remaining avenue for reversal of the denial of The Berkshire Bank’s motion for class certification is an appeal taken after the entry of final judgment on the merits. Accordingly, settlements are likely to be the only way that Lender Class Members will achieve any recovery through the Lender Action. Plaintiffs are currently appealing certain of the Court’s orders. 

    Previous settlements resolving the claims against Citibank, N.A., Citigroup Inc., HSBC Bank plc, HSBC Holdings plc, Barclays Bank plc, JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase Bank. N.A., Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and UBS AG, were granted final approval on December 20, 2018 and May 26, 2020. In the meantime, Plaintiffs continued to pursue the Lender Action against the remaining defendants.

    A Settlement has been reached with Deutsche Bank and that is why you received the Notice. The Settlement does not impact claims in the lawsuit against the Non-Settling Defendants, and the lawsuit is ongoing as an individual action.

    In addition to the Settling Defendant the other named Defendants are:

    • Bank of America Corporation;
    • Bank of America, N.A.;
    • Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd.;
    • Barclays Bank plc;
    • British Bankers’ Association, BBA Enterprises Ltd, and BBA LIBOR Ltd;
    • Citibank, N.A. and Citigroup Inc.;
    • Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen Boerenleenbank B.A.;
    • Credit Suisse Group AG;
    • JPMorgan Chase & Co.;
    • JPMorgan Chase Bank. N.A.
    • Lloyds Banking Group PLC;
    • HBOS PLC;
    • HSBC Bank plc and HSBC Holdings plc;
    • Royal Bank of Canada;
    • The Norinchukin Bank;
    • The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC;
    • UBS AG;
    • WestLB AG; and
    • Westdeutsche Immobilenbank AG.
  • Yes. There are many cases involving similar facts and allegations that have been consolidated as a multi-district litigation (“MDL”) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, entitled: In re LIBOR-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation, 11-MD-2262. The Settlement is made with Plaintiffs in the Lender Action only.

  • In a class action, “Class Representatives” sue on behalf of themselves and others with similar claims, who together are the “Class” or “Class Members.” In this Settlement, the Class Representatives are The Berkshire Bank and the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico. In a class action, one court action resolves the issues for all Class Members, except for those who exclude themselves from the Class. While The Berkshire Bank and Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico represented the Class in negotiating the Settlement, the Court has ruled that The Berkshire Bank did not meet the adequacy of representation requirements imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P.  23(a)(4).

  • The Parties have engaged in lengthy negotiations and Plaintiffs and Settling Defendant have agreed to the Settlement. By agreeing to settle, the Parties avoid the costs and uncertainty of further litigation, and the people affected will get a chance to receive compensation. The Class Representatives and their attorneys think the Settlement is best for all Lender Class Members. The proposed Settlement does not mean that any law was broken or that Settling Defendant did anything wrong.

  • You are included in the Settlement if you (lending institution) are:

    • Headquartered in the United States, including United States territories; and
    • Originated loans, held loans, held interests in loans, owned loans, owned interests in loans, purchased loans, purchased interests in loans, sold loans, or sold interests in loans with interest rates based upon U.S. Dollar LIBOR (“U.S. Dollar LIBOR-Based Loans”), which rates adjusted at any time between August 1, 2007 and May 31, 2010 (see Question 8).


    •  

    You are not a member of the Class, even if you meet the above criteria, if you are:

     

    • One of the Defendants or alleged co-conspirators or their employees, officers, or directors;
    • One of the Defendants’ parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, legal representatives, heirs, successors, assigns, or any person acting on their behalf;
    • An entity in which any Defendants have a controlling interest;
    • Any judicial officers presiding over the Lender Action and the members of his/her immediate families and judicial staff.


    •  

    Investment vehicles (see Question 7) are not excluded from the Class solely because they are, or are managed by, affiliates or subsidiaries of the Defendant. “Investment vehicles” are any investment company, separately managed account or pooled investment fund, including, but not limited to: (i) mutual fund families, exchange-traded funds, fund of funds and hedge funds; and (ii) employee benefit plans.

  • U.S. Dollar LIBOR is based upon the rates at which each individual bank on the U.S. Dollar LIBOR panel could borrow funds, were it to do so by asking for and then accepting inter-bank offers in reasonable market size, just prior to 11:00 am London time, and is calculated as the average of the middle eight contributed rates by the sixteen panel banks each day. It is a reference point for determining certain interest rates for certain financial instruments worldwide. LIBOR rates are calculated for several currencies, such as U.S. Dollars, and several borrowing periods, ranging from overnight to one year. They are published each business day. The Settlement and litigation only involve U.S. Dollar LIBOR.

  • The Settlement relates to U.S. Dollar LIBOR-based loans that include any term, provision, obligation or right to be paid or to receive interest based upon U.S. Dollar LIBOR.

  • If you are not sure whether you are included in the Settlement, you may call 1-833-609-9716 with questions. You may also email the Claims Administrator at info@LendersLiborSettlements.com or write with questions to:

    Lenders LIBOR Settlements
    c/o JND Legal Administration
    P.O. Box 91347
    Seattle, WA 98111

  • The Settlement with the Settling Defendant will create a $425,000 Settlement Fund that will be used to pay eligible Class Members who submitted valid claims. The cost to administer the Settlement, attorneys’ fees, and the payment to the Class Representatives will come out of the Settlement Fund (see Question 20).

    More details are in the Settlement Agreement, which is available on the Important Documents page.

    The deadline to submit a claim passed on February 8, 2021.

  • The Settlement Fund will be distributed to settlement class members pro rata, in proportion to a reasonable estimate of their damages, after deduction of any fees and expenses (see Question 20). This distribution will be made pursuant to a Plan of Distribution, which is available on the Important Documents page. The Plan of Distribution provides that each Class Member will receive a pro rata distribution, based on the reduced interest the Class Member received during the Class Period as a result of the alleged suppression. A chart showing the applicable amount of alleged suppression during the Class Period is available on the Important Documents page, and it is based on expert modeling the Plaintiffs have used in support of their litigation. Class Members had the option to comment or object to any portion of the Plan of Distribution at the Fairness Hearing. The Settlement Agreement will remain in place if the Court rejects or alters the proposed Plan of Distribution, but otherwise approves the Settlement.

  • Class Members who are entitled to payments will receive their payments after the Court grants final approval to the Settlement and after any appeals are resolved (see Question 23 below). If there are appeals, resolving them can take time. Please be patient.

    The Court granted Final Approval on March 15, 2021.

  • Unless you excluded yourself from the Settlement, you gave up your right to sue Settling Defendant for the claims being resolved by these Settlement. The specific claims you gave up against Settling Defendant and all related parties are called “Released Claims” and are set forth in the Proposed Order for Final Approval of the Settlement:

    Any and all manner of claims, causes of action, cross-claims, counterclaims, charges, liabilities, demands, judgments, suits, obligations, debts, setoffs, rights of recovery, or liabilities for any obligations of any kind whatsoever (however denominated), of every nature and description, whether class or individual, in law or equity or arising under constitution, statute, regulation, ordinance, contract, or otherwise in nature, for fees, costs, penalties, fines, debts, expenses, attorneys' fees, and damages, whenever incurred, and liabilities of any nature whatsoever (including joint and several), whether based on federal, state, local, statutory or common law, in equity, or on any other law, rule, regulation (including Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure), ordinance, contract, or the law of any foreign jurisdiction, whether fixed or contingent, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, asserted or unasserted, matured or unmatured, arising from or relating in any way to the origination, ownership, purchase, or sale of loans (or interests in loans, including through mortgage-backed securities, home or business loans, or other instruments) with interest rates tied to LIBOR which adjusted during the Class Period, and the acts, facts, statements, or omissions that were or could have been alleged or asserted by Lender Plaintiffs or any member of the Settlement Class in the Lender Action or in any other action in any court or forum, which any Releasing Party ever had, now has, or hereafter may have against the Released Parties (whether directly, derivatively, representationally, or in any other capacity), from the beginning of time.

    Upon court approval of the Settlement, you will be “releasing” Deutsche Bank and all related persons or entities as described in the Settlement Agreement and the Proposed Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice granting Final Approval to the Settlement. These documents are available on the Important Documents page. Please read these documents carefully. If you have any questions you can contact the law firm listed in Question 19 for free or you can, of course, speak with your own lawyer.

    The Court granted Final Approval on March 15, 2021.

  • Class Members who already submitted a valid Proof of Claim to the Claims Administrator in connection with the previous settlements in the Lender Action were not required to submit a new claim. The Claims Administrator will use the information already on file to ascertain your eligibility for the Settlement.

    Class Members who did not submit a valid Proof of Claim to the Claims Administrator in connection with the previous settlements in the Lender Action must have submitted acceptable Proofs of Claim in connection with this Settlement in order to share in the Settlement proceeds

    The deadline to complete and submit a proof of claim passed on February 8, 2021.

  • The Settlement provides a process for Class Members to contest the rejection of a claim. You will get further details in the letter you receive after your claim has been processed. If your claim is rejected, you may request a review. You will need to do so in writing and submit reasons for why you are contesting the rejection along with any supporting documentation. If your dispute cannot be resolved, it may be presented to the Court for review. The Court’s decision will be final and binding. More details are in the Settlement Agreement, which is available on the Important Documents page.

  • If you did not want to participate in the Settlement, and you wanted to keep the right to sue Deutsche Bank about the issues in this case, then you must have excluded yourself, or “opted out” of, the Class. The deadline to exclude yourself from the Settlement passed on February 8, 2021.

  • To exclude yourself from the Settlement, you must have mail a letter or other written document to the Settlement Administrator (“Request for Exclusion”). The deadline to exclude yourself from the Settlement passed on February 8, 2021.

  • No. Unless you excluded yourself, you give up the right to sue Deutsche Bank for the claims that you released through the Settlement. The deadline to exclude yourself from the Settlement passed on February 8, 2021.

  • No. You will not get a payment if you excluded yourself from the Settlement.

  • The Court has appointed the Pomerantz LLP law firm to represent all Lender Class Members as interim “Class Counsel.” The firm can be contacted at:

    Jeremy A. Lieberman
    POMERANTZ LLP
    600 Third Avenue
    20th Floor
    New York, NY 10016

    You will not be charged for contacting this lawyer. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense.

  • Lender Plaintiffs’ Counsel are awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of $119,000.00 plus interest at the same rate as earned by the Settlement Fund, and expenses in the amount of $59,062.61 plus interest at the same rate as earned by the Settlement Fund, The fees and expenses awarded by the Court will be paid out of the Settlement Fund. Class Counsel may choose to share part of any attorneys’ fees awarded by the Court with Mordchai Krausz, Esq., in accordance with the level of his work and responsibility in the prosecution of this Action. Class Counsel’s choice to share any of the attorneys’ fees awarded by the Court is not subject to Court approval and it will not influence the amount of attorneys’ fees awarded to Class Counsel by the Court.

     

     

  • If you are a member of the Lender Class, you may have objected to any portion of the Settlement. To object, you must have submitted a letter or other written document that included the following:

    • Your name, address, and telephone number;
    • A statement saying that you object to the Lender Class Settlement in In re LIBOR-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. No. 2262;
    • Whether you plan to appear at the Fairness Hearing (see Question 24);
    • Proof of membership in the Class, including documentation evidencing that you originated loans, held loans, held interests in loans, owned loans, owned interests in loans, purchased loans, purchased interests in loans, sold loans, or sold interests in loans with interest rates based upon U.S. Dollar LIBOR between August 1, 2007 and May 31, 2010;
    • The specific reasons you object to the Settlement, along with any supporting materials or documents that you want the Court to consider; and
    • Your signature.

    The deadline to object to the Settlement passed on February 22, 2021.

    COURT LENDER CLASS COUNSEL
    Hon. Naomi Reice Buchwald
    Daniel Patrick Moynihan
    United States Courthouse
    500 Pearl Street
    New York, NY 10007
    Jeremy A. Lieberman
    Pomerantz LLP
    600 Third Avenue,
    20th Floor
    New York, NY 10016
      DEUTSCHE BANK'S COUNSEL
      Elizabeth M. Sacksteder
    Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
    1285 Avenue of the Americas
    New York, New York 10019

    If your objection was not postmarked by the deadline and did not include the information listed above, it was not valid.

  • Objecting is simply telling the Court that you disagree with something about the Settlement. You can object only if you do not exclude yourself from the Class. Excluding yourself is telling the Court that you do not want to be part of the Class. If you excluded yourself, you have no basis to object because the Settlement no longer affect you.

  • The Court held a hearing on March 15, 2021 to decide whether to approve the Settlement and any requests for fees and expenses. You may have attended and you may asked to speak, but you did not have to.

    The Court granted Final Approval of this Settlement on March 15, 2021.

  • The Court held a Fairness Hearing at 11:00 a.m. on March 15, 2021, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007, Courtroom 21A. At this hearing, the Court considered whether the Settlement, Plan of Distribution, and any proposed fees and expenses were fair, reasonable, and adequate. If there were objections, the Court considered them and listened to people who asked to speak at the hearing. The Court also addressed Class Counsel’s request for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement for costs and expenses. 

    The Court granted Final Approval of this Settlement on March 15, 2021.

  • No. Class Counsel answered questions the Court may have had. But, you or your own lawyer were welcome to attend at your expense. If you sent an objection, you did not have to attend the hearing. As long as you mailed your written objection on time, the Court considered it. You may have also had your own lawyer attend, but it was not necessary.

  • You may have asked the Court for permission to speak at the Fairness Hearing. To speak at the Fairness Hearing, you must have sent a letter or other written document saying that the letter or document is your “Notice of Intention to Appear” in the Lender Class Settlement Fairness Hearing in In re LIBOR-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2262. You must have sent your “Notice of Intention to Appear” to the addresses listed in Question 21, so that it was postmarked before the deadline, which passed on February 22, 2021.

  • The notice summarizes the proposed Settlement. More details are in the Settlement Agreement. You can get a copy of the Settlement Agreement or Final Approval Order on the Important Documents page of this website. You also may write with questions to Lenders LIBOR Settlements, c/o JND Legal Administration, P.O. Box 91347, Seattle, WA 98111, by email at info@LendersLiborSettlements.com or call the toll-free number, 1-833-609-9716. You can also get a proof of claim here, or by calling the toll-free number, 1-833-609-9716.
     

For More Information

Visit this website often to get the most up-to-date information.

Mail

Lenders LIBOR Settlements
c/o JND Legal Administration
P.O. Box 91347
Seattle, WA 98111